Home / Compare / Catenix vs Relaymed
Compare · Honest buyer guide
Catenix vs Relaymed: a Relaymed alternative, compared
Relaymed automates point-of-care results into a US practice EHR. Catenix connects the same kinds of analysers, adds full QC governance, and can run the whole clinic testing workflow if you want it. Here is how they compare, and the other alternatives worth knowing.
Published 2 July 2026 · Last reviewed: 15 October 2026 · 7 min read
Quick answer
Short version. Relaymed is US-focused middleware that puts point-of-care results into a practice EHR automatically, matched to the order. It lists 70+ devices and 30+ EHRs, QC approval, state reporting and HITRUST certification, and is priced per ordering provider. Catenix is modular POCT middleware: it connects analysers over HL7, POCT1-A, ASTM and FHIR, adds full quality control (Levey-Jennings charts, Westgard rules and lockout), operator competency, EQA and a tamper-evident audit trail, and can also run registration, reporting and billing. It is priced per clinic or site, with no per-test or per-provider fees.
Choose Relaymed if you are a US practice that only needs results in your EHR and wants state reporting built in. Choose Catenix if you want QC governance and audit records alongside the EHR feed, run several sites, operate outside the US, or want one system for the whole testing visit.
Side by side
| Relaymed | Catenix | |
|---|---|---|
| Core focus | Point-of-care results into the EHR, matched to orders | Connectivity and QC governance, with optional registration, reporting and billing |
| Analyser connectivity | 70+ devices, connected through a software agent to the cloud | HL7 v2, POCT1-A2, ASTM and FHIR through an on-site edge gateway with store-and-forward; new device drivers added on request (supported devices) |
| EHR integration | 30+ US EHRs, including athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Veradigm, Experity, NextGen and Epic | US EHRs including athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Epic, Experity, NextGen and Veradigm, plus UK systems and LIS over open standards |
| Quality control | QC management: organise and approve QC from connected devices | Levey-Jennings charts, Westgard multi-rule evaluation, lockout, operator competency and EQA records |
| Compliance | HITRUST certified; works with COLA to support CLIA requirements | Tamper-evident audit trail and QC, competency and EQA records built for CLIA and ISO 15189:2022 inspections; Cyber Essentials certified |
| State reporting | Notifiable disease reporting built in | Not a standard module; ask about your state's reporting route |
| Patient workflow | Sits alongside the EHR that owns the patient | Use your EHR, or switch on registration, scheduling and encounters |
| Reporting and billing | Focused on the EHR hand-off | Branded reports and billing available as modules |
| Pricing model | Subscription based on the number of ordering providers | Subscription per clinic or site plus optional modules; no per-test or per-provider fees (pricing) |
| Region | US practices | International, including UK and US clinics, with regional data residency |
Relaymed alternatives worth knowing
Point-of-care software falls into three groups. Pick the group that matches what already sits around your testing, then compare products inside it.
| Alternative | Type | Usually suits |
|---|---|---|
| Catenix | Modular POCT middleware and clinic platform | Clinics, multi-site groups and labs that want connectivity plus QC governance, with or without an EHR |
| TELCOR QML | Enterprise POC data manager | US hospitals and health systems |
| Abbott AegisPOC and RALS | Enterprise POC data manager | Hospitals with a large Abbott fleet |
| Siemens POCcelerator | Enterprise POC data manager | Hospitals with Siemens point-of-care devices |
| Radiometer AQURE | Enterprise POC data manager | Hospitals centred on blood gas |
| Roche navify POC Operations | Enterprise POC data manager | Hospitals with Roche point-of-care devices |
| Clinisys POCT | Laboratory-led POCT management | UK and European hospital laboratories |
| EKF Link | Results-to-EHR connectivity | Practices using EKF analysers |
For the wider picture, see POCT middleware alternatives and what POCT middleware is.
Switching from Relaymed
Moving does not mean replacing your EHR. A typical switch keeps the EHR, connects the analysers to Catenix through the on-site gateway, and points results at the same EHR interface. Most clinics run both side by side for a short period, check that results match, then switch off the old feed. QC targets can be entered per control lot from your existing data, so Westgard rules and lockout can be active from day one. See how implementation works and Catenix for US clinics.
Already have systems in place?
Worth being clear: having an EHR is not a reason to skip Catenix. Catenix is modular. A common starting point is to keep the EHR you already run and switch on only Catenix connectivity and quality control, so results flow off your analysers, get their QC and audit trail, and land in your EHR automatically. If it earns its place, clinics then turn on reporting, registration or billing. You are never forced to replace what already works.
Questions clinics ask
Paraphrased from the questions POCT coordinators and clinic owners raise in buyer forums and on calls.
What are the best Relaymed alternatives?
It depends on your setting. For clinics and multi-site groups that want results in the EHR plus QC governance, Catenix is a modular alternative. Hospitals usually look at enterprise point-of-care data managers such as TELCOR QML, Abbott AegisPOC and RALS, Siemens POCcelerator, Radiometer AQURE and Roche navify POC Operations. Practices using EKF analysers may look at EKF Link.
What is the difference between Catenix and Relaymed?
Relaymed focuses on getting point-of-care results into a US practice EHR automatically, matched to the order. Catenix covers the same connectivity and adds full QC governance (Levey-Jennings charts, Westgard rules and lockout), operator competency and EQA records, and optional registration, reporting and billing. Having an EHR does not rule Catenix out: many clinics keep their EHR and use Catenix as the connectivity and QC layer that feeds it.
Does Relaymed do quality control?
Yes. Relaymed offers QC management that lets you organise and approve quality controls from connected devices. Catenix goes further on QC: Levey-Jennings charts, Westgard multi-rule evaluation, automatic lockout when a rule fails, and the review records inspectors expect. If QC governance matters to you, compare the two on that specifically.
Does Catenix work with US EHRs like athenahealth and eClinicalWorks?
Yes. Catenix sends results to US EHRs over open standards and has integration guides for athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Epic, Experity, NextGen, Veradigm and others. Confirm your EHR's interface options on a call before you switch.
Is Relaymed available in the UK and Europe?
Relaymed's website describes practices across the US and does not mention the UK or Europe. Catenix serves clinics internationally, including the UK and the US, with regional data residency, and integrates with UK systems such as EMIS Web and SystmOne as well as US EHRs.
How are Catenix and Relaymed priced?
Relaymed is a subscription based on the number of ordering providers. Catenix is a subscription per clinic or site plus optional modules, with no per-test or per-provider fees. Both quote after a demo.
Which is better for a clinic that also needs reporting and billing?
Catenix. Relaymed concentrates on the results-to-EHR link. Catenix can carry the visit through to a branded report and an invoice, so a clinic without a larger system behind it runs fewer separate tools.
See Catenix for yourself
The fairest comparison is your own analysers on your own bench. Book a walkthrough, or compare other point-of-care software.
Comparisons are compiled from vendors' own public materials as of October 2026 and describe products in good faith. Product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used for identification only. Details change; confirm specifics with each vendor.